For some years now, there’s been controversy over the ecological
impact of several new dams planned for Chilean Patagonia, and concern over
the deforestation required to build transmission towers through thousands of
kilometers an almost roadless area. That’s still unsettled but, in the interim,
plans for similar
hydroelectric projects in Argentine Patagonia have gone almost unnoticed
outside the country’s borders.
Environmentally, the parallels are imperfect. On the
well-watered Chilean side, exposed to Pacific storms, the dense native forests
are vulnerable and erosion could be severe; on the Argentine side, the Río
Santa Cruz meanders through seemingly endless steppe. In April of
1834, according to Charles Darwin, Captain Robert FitzRoy
of the HMS Beagle organized
an excursion up the broad Río Santa Cruz,
around the site of present-day town of Piedra
Buena (the bridge pictured above crosses the river just south of town), but
the strong current forced the crews of three whaleboats to pull the vessels upstream
from shore.
As Darwin described it, the river (pictured above) “runs in a winding
course through a valley, which extends in a direct line westward. This valley
varies from five to ten miles in breadth; it is bounded by step-formed
terraces, which rise in most parts, one above the other, to the height of five
hundred feet, and have on the opposite sides a remarkable correspondence.” Over
three weeks, the expedition managed to ascend roughly 140 miles and came within
sight of the snow-covered Andes before turning back; an ascent that took them
nearly six days of hard labor took just one to return to the Beagle, anchored
on the Atlantic coast.
Given the terrain that Darwin describes, the hydroelectric
potential is obvious and, in fact, there are two dams planned at sites
downstream from the popular tourist town of El
Calafate. The more westerly of the two will be named for the late president
Néstor Kirchner,
husband of current president Cristina
Fernández de Kirchner, while the more easterly will take its name from Jorge Cepernic, a former
governor of Santa Cruz province.
While the ecological consequences of flooding parts of the
sprawling Argentine steppe may not be quite so dire as deforesting the Chilean
side and submerging its rushing whitewater, the project is not without
controversy. First proposed in 2007, it failed to find adequate funding and
then, three years later, a Buenos
Aires-based consortium took it over. That lasted only briefly, though,
after a dispute between the province and the federal government, followed by a
new contract with a different group and the Chinese construction company Gezhouba, which built
the controversial Three
Gorges Dam on the Yangtze. The
cost, though, will be nearly US$1 billion greater than the previous bid, raising questions as to where all that extra money will go.
No comments:
Post a Comment