Around the world, the biggest news the past couple days has
been the impact of Hurricane Sandy on North America. The surging tropical deluge that began in the western Caribbean and worked its way north,
colliding with polar air over the eastern seaboard, has inundated large areas
with tidal surges and river flooding, shut down essential services including
hospitals and subways, and dislocated or confined millions of people. New York
City, of course, has drawn the most attention, as the local infrastructure has
been unable to deal with a storm of this magnitude.
By contrast, almost nobody outside South America has noted
that Buenos
Aires and its surrounding Pampas are also experiencing a series of
ferocious storms. According to Montevideo-based Mercopress, a storm that shows no sign of relenting
dropped 200 mm (eight inches) of rain in just two hours early yesterday
morning, and has led to two deaths and the evacuation
of 3,400 citizens in the capital and
Buenos Aires province.
South America’s relatively low international profile aside,
its own climatic phenomena do not have the same notoriety as Caribbean
hurricanes, and that’s partly a matter of physical geography. In the northern
hemisphere, the South
Equatorial Current flows northwest toward the Caribbean, where the
atmosphere becomes saturated with humidity and forms the cataclysmic storms
that hit the North American continent. In the southern hemisphere, though, the
southward-flowing Brazil
Current turns eastward into the open Atlantic rather than approaching the
South American continent.
For that reason, Buenos Aires doesn’t get catastrophic
single events like Sandy, but what I like to call the New York of
South America does get big storms that can stress local resources, largely
because of its own unique geography. The city and its low-lying Pampas have
almost no relief, and the watercourses that cross them quickly flood the low
lying terrain, as they did when I was in the Pampas city of San
Antonio de Areco (pictured above) three Xmases ago.
In the city itself, most of these watercourses have been
undergrounded since colonial times – you can get an idea of what’s been done in
the past by visiting San Telmo’s Zanjón de
Granados (pictured above). Still, though, the city’s infrastructure
is still not prepared to handle heavy rainfall, as local officials recently
admitted. In big storms the water can run knee deep along streets such
as Palermo’s Avenida Juan B. Justo – the channeled Arroyo Maldonado that runs
beneath it cannot absorb such quantities.
What’s lacking, in part, is the political will to solve, or
at least mitigate, the problem. No single government may be to blame for a
long-running problem but, at a time when the federal government is spending
US$150 million per year to subsidize Fútbol
para Todos (Soccer for Everyone) on public TV, one can certainly question
current priorities.
2 comments:
The difference may be, that to a certain extent we're used to it - we get flooding like this a couple of times a year. It's a pain, it causes problems, and sometimes, as this time, people die, but we know it's going to happen at some point (not necessarily the last part), and I think in general folk here take it in stride and get on with life once the rain lets up. Subways down? Take the bus. Both down? Walk/wade. Can't even do that? Stay home. Power out? Light candles. And we don't even send out a zillion tweets and FB updates about it on an every five minute basis. Hell, I didn't even think it worth mentioning on either until friends from other places started asking, "I heard you got hit by a huge storm too...?"
LIke you, if it's really pouring, I tend to stay in. I do appreciate that we're on the second floor, so the water's unlikely to reach our level - if I were on the ground floor like you, I'd be more concerned.
Post a Comment